Showing posts with label Adjustment Aid. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Adjustment Aid. Show all posts

Friday, March 18, 2022

New Jersey's 2022-23 State Aid

New Jersey's 2022-23 state aid distribution is another big step towards state aid fairness.

Thanks to the addition of $650 million of new K-12 opex aid plus $186 million in redistributed Adjustment Aid,  underaided districts will gain $836 million.  Their deficit will shrink from $1.2 billion in 2021-22 to only $618 million for 2022-23.  The overaided districts will have a surplus of $232 million.

The net deficit, ie deficit minus surplus, is only $386 million.

Below is an analysis of 2022-23 state aid and education spending, organized in the following way:

  • Details About the Underaided.
    • The Education Adequacy Report Misses the late 2021-22 Inflationary Spike.
  • Details About the Overaided.
  • Other Education Spending.
  • Local Fair Share Disparities.


As usual, I've put all the data available on a spreadsheet: 2022-23 NJ State Aid.


Likewise, the surplus for the overaided districts will shrink from $362 million in 2021-22 to $232 million in 2022-23.  Since 2017-18, New Jersey has redistributed $687 million.

Amount Redistributed
2022-23$186 million
2021-22$193 million
2020-21$155 million
2019-20$90 million
2018-19$32 million
2017-18$31 million

Without state aid redistribution, the deficit would be $1.3 billion.  

Because S2 calls for a 76% reduction of Adjustment Aid in 2023-24, this means that at least $176 million in Adjustment Aid will be redistributed in 2023-24, which, combined with the state aid increases we've seen in the last few years, brings 100% state aid for all districts within reach.

Details About the Underaided

Counting vo-techs and non-operating districts, there are 391 underaided districts with a total enrollment of 961,649, or 74% of the total.

In total dollars, the district with the largest deficit is Newark, at -$98,901,597, or -$1,799 pp.  Newark's state aid has risen from $742 million in 2017-18 to $1 billion in 2022-23, but its deficit was originally so large ($146 million) and its Adequacy Budget has grown so much, that the deficit has not yet been eliminated despite getting $258 million in additional state aid.

The districts with the largest deficits per pupil are Cumberland County Vo-Tech at -$3,109 pp and Atlantic City at -$3,057 pp. Cumberland County Vo-Tech and Atlantic City are the only two districts with per pupil deficits over $3,000 per pupil. Their deficits are large, but in 2017-18 Atlantic City and Bound Brook had deficits of over $8000 per student.

In percentage terms, Loch Arbour is the most underaided, but it 69%, $23,359 out of $33,685.  No other district is below 70%.  Only five other districts are even below 80%.  




This is a huge contrast to 2017-18, when 96 districts got less than 50% of their recommended state aid.  It's a huge contrast to when Chesterfield got only 10% of its state aid target.


The Education Adequacy Report Misses Inflation

Second reason this year's deficit decreased so much is that the triannual Education

Adequacy Report's inflationary adjustment stopped in June 2021.
  Hence, SFRA's Base Payment per pupil barely budged, from only $12,177 per student to $12,451 per student.   (see at right)

From June 2021 to February 2022 inflation has been 4.4% and is running even faster now.

This is an important fact because it means aid increases to the underaided are smaller than they initially appeared and aid cuts are larger to the overaided.

Since New Jersey's projected enrollment fell from 1,316,864 in 2021-22 to 1,304,773, the statewide Adequacy Budget did not increase very much despite the inflationary adjustment.

Details About The Overaided

The 201 overaided districts have 343,124 students, or 26% of the total.  Their $232 million surplus is the smallest it has ever been.

Asbury Park's state aid loss merits attention: In 2019-20 Asbury Park's surplus was $22.9 million, or $11,026 per student.  Now it is only $7 million, or $3,653 per student.  Asbury Park's K-12 state aid per student has fallen from $25,000 per student (it was the highest spending K-12 district in the US), to only $15,176 per student.  

Jersey City's aid loss merits attention too.  In 2018-19 its surplus peaked at $171 million, or $5542 per student.  Now it is only $56 million, or $1903 per student.  In total K-12 opex aid, Jersey CIty's aid has gone from $419 million to $185 million, a loss of $234 million.  

Jersey City has actually lost more than $115 million, but it has a constant growth in tax base which converts its Equalization Aid to Adjustment Aid, which is then phased-out per the process laid out in S2.  In 2022-23 Jersey City will still be eligible for $82 million in Adjustment Aid.

The redistribution of state aid for 2022-23 was not something I was sure would happen after the Biden administration, acting on a vicious Education Law Center complaint, interpreted a provision in the ARP to prohibit state aid cuts to high-poverty districts (which Hoboken and Jersey City technically are), but apparently the Murphy administration has found a way to continue aid redistribution.  

Other Education Spending

New Jersey's budget for FY2023 is going to be $49 billion, of which $19.16 billion, or 39%, is considered school aid (see page 58).  That ~40% percentage has been constant for the last decade, although it's worth noting that in 2001 education spending was only 31% of the budget.

On the other hand, education spending actually exceeds the income tax's $18.15 haul due to education getting money from the lottery and a half cent of the sales tax.  Education spending has come to be nearly synonymous with the Property Tax Relief Fund, although the new ANCHOR credit will represent a long-overdue increase for direct tax rebates.




K-12 opex aid is just $9.9 billion, so 52% of the total education spending.  Here are some looks at the other major education spending categories.

Amounts in millions.

Extraordinary Aid will be $400 million.

Below are the net changes year over year for the above categories.  As you can see, the major debt categories of Teacher Pension And Annuity Fund, post-retirement healthcare, construction debt, and Pension Obligation Bonds did not require substantial increases and TPAF and Construction Debt service actually fell.  This is a tremendous contrast to the past, when TPAF payments increased by over $400 million in some years.



Disparities in Local Fair Share

Readers of this blog know that New Jersey's Local Fair Share is NOT a constant tax rate due to it being based 50% on Equalized Valuation and 50% on Aggregate Income.  Thus, towns where residents live within their means in properties that are inexpensive relative to income must pay higher school taxes, as well as property owners in towns without non-residential property and vacation homes.  

New Jersey's Local Fair Share grew from SFRA's inception in 2008-09 when it was a 1.15% median and peaked in 2019-20 at 1.53%.  The cause of the growth was that Adequacy Budgets grew faster than Equalization Aid, so the SFRA formula automatically adjusted to increase Local Fair Share.  (Brick and Toms River repeatedly complained that their Local Fair Shares have increased despite loss of Equalized Valuation, but that has happened statewide).

Phil Murphy's increase to Equalization Aid exceeds the growth of the statewide Adequacy Budget, hence Local Fair Share actually will fall 1.38%, with a low of 0.79% for Wildwood City and a high of 1.91% for Woodlynne (which peaked at 2.1% in 2019-20).

The decrease in Local Fair Share also decreased the number of districts who are ineligible for Equalization Aid from 272 in 2020-21 to 260 in 2022-23. (Note, in SFRA's first year only 180 districts were ineligible for Equalization Aid).

The extremes of LFS are here:



The 2022-23 Local Fair Share formula is:

(0.013089410 x Equalized Valuation + 0.045610629 x Aggregate Income)/2

Conclusion

FY2022-23 was another good year for K-12 opex aid equity.  We have come a long way from the time when New Jersey's state aid formula was inoperative in the early 2010s (which was Christie's fault) and when huge education-debt increases crowded out K-12 opex aid increases (which was not Christie's fault).  If the state's revenues continue to grow, in 2023-24 it's possible that every district will reach 100% funding.  

SFRA is always a work in progress and the legislature is moving to revamp the state aid law.  If it does
so, I hope it includes the following.
  • The tax cap must be loosened for under-Adequacy non-Abbotts who are losing state aid.  
  • The state must move up the timetable on its inflationary adjustment due to the 2022 Education Adequacy Report stopping its inflationary measurement in June 2021
  • New Jersey should base its Local Fair Share solely on taxable property.

Overall, Phil Murphy has been a positive surprise on state aid.  Although I knew that he would increase K-12 opex spending, I did not expect him to prioritize fairness of the distribution as much as he has.

Tuesday, April 30, 2019

The Jersey City State Aid Lawsuit Will Fail


On Monday, April 29th, the Jersey City Board of Education announced that it was suing the State of New Jersey in order to cancel the redistribution of Jersey City's Adjustment Aid and, apparently, to challenge the constitutionality of SFRA itself.

The lawsuit is being litigated by a Newark law firm called Angelo & Burns.  The lawsuit uses data compiled by the Education Law Center, although the ELC itself is not mentioned at all.  Based on the press conference, the lawsuit is supported by the Jersey City Education Association.

The core of the Jersey City Board of Education's argument is that the Jersey City Public Schools are below Adequacy and that it is the state's obligation to fund Jersey City at its Adequacy Budget,"From the 2009-2010 school year through the 2018-19 school year, JCBOE has been funded at a cumulative level more than $574,772,516 below that which was necessary for it to provide a thorough and efficient education."

Since Jersey City is below Adequacy and is an Abbott district, therefore it is unconstitutional for the Jersey City Public Schools to lose any state aid.

Page after page of the filing shows that Jersey City Public Schools are below legal Adequacy and "underfunded," although that fact is not in dispute.

EG:
























There are several major problems with the Jersey City lawsuit, the two major ones being:

  1. S2 eliminated the Tax Cap for Abbott Districts.
  2. Jersey City does not have municipal overburden.

There is No Tax Cap for Abbott Districts

The lawsuit makes repeated references to the tax cap constraining the Jersey City Board of Education's ability to increase taxes, but what the Jersey City Board of Education doesn't want the public, journalists, judges, or politicians to know is that S2 abolished the tax cap for Abbott districts.  


(3)  In the case of an SDA district, as defined puruant to section 3 of P.L.2000, C.72 (C.18A:7G-3), in which the prebudget year adjusted tax levy is less than the school district's prebudget year local share as calculated pursuant to section 10 of P.L.2007, C.260 (C.18A:7F-52), the allowable adjustment for increases to raise a tax levy that does not exceed the school district's local share shall equal the difference between the prebudget year adjusted tax levy and the prebudget year local share.
Since Jersey City's 2018-19 Local Fair Share was $399 million and its tax levy was $124 million, the Jersey City Board of Education could easily raise taxes by $30 million, $40 million, or $50 million to compensate for the loss of $27 million in Adjustment Aid and to close the deficit with its Adequacy Budget.  Legally speaking, the Jersey City Board of Education could raise taxes by $275 million.

The only acknowledgement by the JCBOE that the tax cap was eliminated for Abbotts came in the three words buried here.  "SFRA's two percent property tax cap [sic], only recently removed, has constrained the speed with which JCBOE can increase its local revenue to provide funding consistent with its LFS."

There is No Municipal Overburden in Jersey City

The lawsuit constantly talks about "municipal overburden" as being a justification for the Abbott holdings laws, which is correct in terms of the judicial history of the Abbott Regime, but not correct today due to the massive increase in Jersey City's tax base and fall in its tax rate.



Jersey City's school tax rate for 2018-19 was only 0.4241, which is well below NJ's 1.25 school tax rate average, and down from 0.6065 as recently as 2013-14.

Add caption


In conclusion, the above are just the two major factual and contextual problems with the Jersey City state aid lawsuit.  However, he foundational problem with the Jersey City Board of Education lawsuit is that it ignores NJ's fiscal crisis and how the continuation of Jersey City's Adjustment Aid would mean that other districts receive less than SFRA calls for them to get. 

-----

See Also:






Tuesday, March 19, 2019

2019-20 State Aid Gets Fairer, but Deficit Grows


For 2019-20 school year Phil Murphy proposed to increase overall K-12 opex aid by $206 million and redistribute another $90 million of Adjustment Aid, for an all-in increase of $296 million for underaided districts, with the bulk of that new money going to districts who are severely underaided.

However, despite the increase in state aid, the deficit for the underaided districts rose from $1.75 billion to $1.78 billion.

Although $296 million increase is very large and appreciated by the recipient districts, since the deficit constantly grows, the increase is only sufficient to prevent further backsliding into
deeper deficit, as New Jersey struggles to advance against a strong headwind of inflation and then enrollment growth and tax base erosion that is disproportionately in districts who are already underaided.

Indeed, inflation's contribution to the growth of the funding target in 2019-20 is particularly large due to the FY2020 Education Adequacy Report and the $566 per student increase in the base cost per student.

This post is a first look at state aid disparities in 2019-20 and emphasize that SFRA funding targets are dynamic.  In 2018-19 it would have cost $9,562,210,757 to fully fund SFRA, but in 2019-20 it would cost $9,801,544,588 to fully fund SFRA.  The increase in costs is disproportionately in underaided districts, hence the constant growth of their aid deficit.    


Note, the deficits reflected above would be the _net_ deficit if every district was funded at exactly 100% (implying that
all Adjustment Aid were eliminated).  The more meaningful deficit is that for the underaided districts, which is $1.787 billion for 2019-20.

Thus, the number of underaided districts slightly grew, and so did the deficit itself, which rose from $1.75 billion to $1.8 billion.

Despite the size of the $90 million reduction in surplus aid (ie, "Adjustment Aid"), the total amount of excess aid is only falling by $10 million, from $651.9 million to $641.7 million aid surplus, which simultaneously grew due to continued enrollment loss, tax base growth, and the DOE's changes to the formula for Local Fair Share.  The stability of Adjustment Aid is due to continuing enrollment loss and tax base growth, although the contribution of tax base growth is disproportionately from Jersey City alone.   (discussion below).

Lakewood, despite being overaided in 2018-19, gained $14.9 million in SFRA-non compliant aid, which the DOE is listing in its normal state aid releases.  Lakewood's increase also appears to increase the statewide amount of excess aid.

This blog post is based on state aid information from the Department of Education which I received after an OPRA request.  The calculations of state aid deficits, percentage overaiding/underaiding, dollars per student overaiding/underaiding and tax stress are done by me.  The 2019-20 State Aid Disparities information is available online here.

The Big Picture

Statewide, the median district has a deficit of $383 per student and gets 86% of its Uncapped Aid.  The median deficit is smaller than in 2018-19, when it was $417 per student and the median percentage is slightly better than 2018-19, when it was 86%.

There are 383 underaided districts, with a total deficit of $1.8 billion and 209 overaided districts with a total surplus of $641 million.

There are zero districts who get exactly 100% of their state aid, which is a contrast from 2018-19, when 16 districts got 100%. The slippage of any districts getting 100% is the reason there are apparent increases in the number of overaided and underaided districts.  (the lack of 100% funded districts is due to S2)

The Underaided

There are 96 districts who are underaided by more than $2,000 per student for 2019-20, versus 109 districts with deficits over $2,000 per student in 2018-19.  In 2019-20 there will be 30 districts are underaided by more than $4,000 per student, versus 35 in 2018-19.

So this is incremental reduction in severe underaiding.

The district with the largest state aid deficit is Atlantic City, whose deficit is -$56 million, or -$8,534 per student.  (this deficit includes AC's $20 million in "Commercial Valuation Stabilization Aid,"  

After Atlantic City, the districts with the biggest deficits are:

DistrictDeficit in Dollars PPDistrictDeficit in Dollars PP
BRIDGETON CITY-$4,488FREEHOLD BORO-$5,694
PLAINFIELD-$4,552DOVER TOWN-$5,809
EGG HARBOR CITY-$4,603ATLANTIC CO VOC-$5,942
DUNELLEN BORO-$4,850LINDENWOLD-$6,075
WOODLYNNE-$4,868PASSAIC VOC.-$6,115
HALEDON BORO-$4,992FAIRVIEW-$6,268
PROSPECT PARK-$5,085HI NELLA-$6,562
ROSELLE BORO-$5,283BOUND BROOK-$6,776
NORTH PLAINFIELD-$5,308CUMBERLAND VOC.-$8,181
MANCHESTER REG-$5,689ATLANTIC CITY*-$8,534

These deficits are unacceptable, and yet an improvement from 2018-19, when there were 109
Bound Brook, NJ.
Still one of NJ's most underaided school districts.
districts who were underaided by at least $2,000 per student and 35 who are underaided by at least $4,000 per student or more. 

Bound Brook also shows improvement. The -$6,776 deficit is huge, but it is smaller than in 2017-18, when Bound Brook's deficit was -$9,546 per student or 2016-17 when Bound Brook's deficit was -$9,836.

The reason the increase for Bound Brook hasn't been larger is significant loss of tax base there and corresponding increase in the Uncapped Aid target.  Although tax base erosion is the rarest cause of severe underaiding

In order to demonstrate the decline in severe underaiding, the following table shows the most underaided districts starting with 2016-17, the rock bottom year of state aid injustice, and how Steve Sweeney's fight for fairness (now supported by Phil Murphy) has brought results, although equity is still years away (and perhaps unattainable).


DistrictDeficit Per Pupil in 2016-17Gain in Dollars Per Student for 2017-18Gain in Dollars Per Student for 2018-19Gain in Dollars Per Student for 2019-20Deficit Per Pupil in 2019-20 (projected)
Dover-$6,558$417$776$868-$5,809
Guttenberg-$6,645$511$1,337$392-$2,626
Ridgefield Park-$6,740$491$1,764$290-$1,942
Atlantic City-$7,270$816$700TBDTBD
Hi Nella-$7,302$427$817$981-$6,562
Atlantic Co Voc-Tech-$7,529$733$2,213$888-$5,942
Passaic Co Voc-Tech-$7,551$520$1,302$914-$6,115
Fairview Boro-$7,625$630$1,951$937-$6,268
Freehold Boro-$8,243$0$1,890$851-$5,694
Manchester Reg-$8,698$653$1,830$850-$5,689
East Newark-$8,716$397$514$464-$3,106
Bound Brook-$9,836$865$2,289$1,013-$6,776
Because state aid is dynamic, 2016-17 deficit + new aid will not equal the 19-20 deficit.

Although I consider deficits in dollars-per-student more significant than percentage deficits, something encouraging about 2019-20 is that there will be only three districts who get less than 50% of their Uncapped Aid: North Brunswick and Cumberland Co Vocational at 48%, and Woodbridge at 46%.

Since in 2016-17 Chesterfield only got 9% of its Uncapped Aid, let it also be marked as an improvement too that the bottom has risen from 9% to 46%.



There are also only 55 districts getting 60% of their Uncapped Aid.  In 2018-19 there were 151.

HOWEVER, some districts are becoming more underaided, especially ones who already receive high percentages of their state aid, but whose state aid targets are so high that even getting 80% of their state aid translates into a large deficit.  For a district already getting a high percentage of its state aid, the gain under S2 will be proportionally small.

This scenario is true of many of the Abbotts.  Paterson, Elizabeth, and Newark all gained state aid, but saw their state aid deficits increase.  (A future post will examine the Abbotts in detail)

The Biggest Gainers

Newark grabbed headlines for gaining $24.7 million, but Newark is a district of 52,000 students, and that only is $469 per student.

Lakewood gained the most in percentage terms at 64%, but Lakewood is sui generis and much of that money will not go to support public education.  Atlantic City gained the second most in percentage terms at 39%, but Atlantic City also seemingly lost $12 million in Commercial Valuation Aid and its net increase is small.

Of normal districts, the biggest gain in percentage terms was Woodbridge, at 22% (+$7.4 million), but that is $531 per student.

The real biggest gainers, in dollars per student are:


CUMBERLAND VOC.$1,222
HI NELLA$981
FAIRVIEW$937
PASSAIC COUNTY VOC.$914
ATLANTIC CO VOC.$888
DOVER$868
FREEHOLD BORO$851
PLAINFIELD CITY$841
LINDENWOLD$799
NORTH PLAINFIELD$793
ROSELLE BORO$789
BRIDGETON$768
PROSPECT PARK$760
HALEDON BORO$746
WOODLYNNE$727


The Overaided Districts

There are 209 districts who are receiving more state aid than the SFRA formula says they should
Asbury Park
AP Lost $3 million in Adjustment Aid
But Actually Became MORE Overaided
Due to Tax Base Growth, Enrollment
Loss, and the increase in the LFS formula.
receive, with a total surplus of $641 million.

Of those districts:
  • 130 are overaided by more than $1,000 per student.
  • 75 are overaided by more than $2,000 per student.
  • 37 are overaided by more than $3,000 per student.
  • 13 are overaided by more than $4,000 per student.
Asbury Park, as always, is the most overaided district in New Jersey, with a surplus of $11,026 per student.   (Asbury Park's state aid +186% of its SFRA target)  Asbury Park's excess aid alone is more than the $9324 per student that its high-FRL, severely underaided neighbor Freehold Boro will receive.

In percentage terms, Washington Township in Burlington County is the most overaided, getting $435,110 more for its 55 students than SFRA recommends, or 545% of its SFRA target.

Many Overaided Districts Became More Overaided

Despite the loss of $90 million in Adjustment Aid (13%), a large number of overaided districts became more overaided, the most important of which is Jersey City.

The following 15 districts had the largest Adjustment Aid totals in New Jersey.  Altogether they represent 60% of the 2018-19 total.

As you can see, six of the fifteen districts with the most Adjustment Aid gained Adjustment Aid for 2019-20, despite the 13% Adjustment Aid cuts they experienced.


2018-19 Adjustment Aid2019-20 Adjustment AidAdjustment Aid Gain or Loss
JERSEY CITY$170,778,034$182,106,881$11,328,847
PEMBERTON$25,259,032$17,725,530-$7,533,502
EAST ORANGE$24,391,436$18,288,196-$6,103,240
FREEHOLD REGIONAL$24,090,617$25,302,050$1,211,433
ASBURY PARK$23,563,095$22,933,389-$629,706
BRICK$21,331,456$18,349,599-$2,981,857
TOMS RIVER REG.$17,581,822$18,607,945$1,026,123
JACKSON TWP$15,963,963$15,372,258-$591,705
MANALAPAN-ENGLISHTOWN REG$12,175,534$10,297,786-$1,877,748
NEPTUNE TWP$11,424,541$10,939,598-$484,943
OLD BRIDGE$11,126,695$13,123,877$1,997,182
VERNON$9,970,059$9,406,636-$563,423
HOWELL$9,715,911$11,012,370$1,296,459
HOPATCONG$8,229,916$7,308,000-$921,916
WASHINGTON (Gloucester)$8,164,374$9,737,141$1,572,767

The causes of the increases are different for each district, but the usual factors are enrollment loss and tax base growth, plus the tweaking of the Local Fair Share multipliers.

Jersey City merits special discussion here:
Jersey City's Local Fair Share grew from $399 million to $474 million (+$75 million).  Although Jersey City's Adequacy Budget grew from $590 million to $622 million (+$32 million), which all-else-being-equal would increase Jersey City's Equalization Aid, the increase in Local Fair Share was so much larger than the increase in the Adequacy Budget and then the cut of $27 million in Adjustment Aid that Jersey City's state aid surplus actually grew by the $11 million you see above.  (See Note 1)

Aside from the usual enrollment loss and/or tax base growth, the Murphy administration also increased the Local Fair Share multipliers by 6% and that drive increases in Local Fair Share that were larger than the increases for Adequacy Budgets.

The 2018-19 Local Fair Share formula was:

(Equalized Valuation x 0.013828828) / 2 + (Aggregate Income x 0.046200477) / 2

Which looks complex, but was really 0.69% of Equalized Valuation plus 2.3% of Income.

But this is the formula for 2019-20

(Equalized Valuation x 0.014523812) / 2 + (Aggregate Income x 0.049819447) / 2 

Which is really 0.73% of Equalized Valuation plus 2.5% of Income.

-----

(1)  This refers to Jersey City's Adequacy Budget for Equalization Aid.

See Also: